Roti (Chapati) vs पुरी

दोन्ही बाजू एकाच तक्त्यावरून मोजल्या आहेत, आणि प्रत्येक पदार्थ प्रत्यक्षात ज्या प्रमाणात खाल्ला जातो त्या सर्व्हिंगवर.

Roti (Chapati)

kcal per 1 medium phulka roti (45 g) · 208 kcal/100 g

विरुद्ध

पुरी

110

kcal per 1 poori (30 g) · 367 kcal/100 g

अधिक ऊर्जा-घन

The short answer

कोणता जड आहे

Per 100 g, poori is heavier — 367 kcal against 208 kcal for roti (chapati), about 76% more. Per real serving the picture changes: 1 medium phulka roti of roti (chapati) is 94 kcal, while 1 poori of poori is 110 kcal, because the portions are not the same size. On protein, roti (chapati) wins with 7.1 g per 100 g.

स्रोत·ICMR–NIN dietary guidance for Indians + weighed portions·1 medium phulka roti entered at 45 g·पुनरावलोकन जुलै 2026

शेजारी शेजारी

	Roti (Chapati)	पुरी
गृहीत धरलेले सर्व्हिंग	1 मध्यम फुलका · 45 g	1 poori · 30 g
प्रति सर्व्हिंग कॅलरी	94	110
प्रति 100 g कॅलरी	208	367
प्रति 100 g प्रथिने	7.1 g	6.4 g
प्रति 100 g कर्बोदके	42.7 g	38.4 g
प्रति 100 g स्निग्धांश	1.0 g	20.9 g
प्रति 100 g तंतू	7.3 g	6.6 g
एक सर्व्हिंग जाळण्यासाठी लागणारे चालणे	22 मिनिटे	26 मिनिटे

स्रोत·IFCT 2017 + published recipe weights·पुनरावलोकन जुलै 2026

दोन पदार्थांची तुलना कशी शक्य केली जाते

Both columns start from the same source — the per-100 g rows for roti (chapati) and poori in the Indian Food Composition Tables 2017. वाद जिंकण्यासाठी कोणतीही बाजू वेगळ्या डेटाबेसमधून घेतलेली नाही.
Each dish keeps its own serving weight: 1 medium phulka roti at 45 g, 1 poori at 30 g. दोन्हींना एकाच समान 100 g वर बसवणे हेच बहुतेक अन्नतुलना निरुपयोगी करते.
नंतर दोन्ही ओळी एकाच पद्धतीने प्रमाणात आणल्या जातात आणि शेजारी शेजारी छापल्या जातात, त्यामुळे प्रति-ग्रॅम क्रम आणि प्रति-ताट क्रम उघडपणे वेगळे पडू शकतात — आणि भारतीय पदार्थांच्या बाबतीत ते नेहमीच पडतात.

Roti (Chapati)     208 kcal/100 g ×  45 g ÷ 100 = 94 kcal
Poori              367 kcal/100 g ×  30 g ÷ 100 = 110 kcal

The full method, and where it is weakest →

हे कसे वाचावे

Per-100 g comparisons flatter whatever is eaten in small portions. Poori is denser per gram, but people do not eat by the gram — roti (chapati) arrives as 1 medium phulka roti and poori as 1 poori, and that is where the real difference shows up.

Roti (Chapati) carries more protein, which matters more than the calorie gap if you are trying to stay full. Fibre also favours roti (chapati) here. Both figures assume home cooking with a measured amount of oil; a restaurant plate of either can run 30 to 60% higher.

प्रश्न

Which has more calories, roti (chapati) or poori?

Which has more protein, roti (chapati) or poori?

Roti (Chapati) — 7.1 g per 100 g against 6.4 g. Per real serving that becomes 3.2 g in 1 medium phulka roti against 1.9 g in 1 poori.

दोन्ही तुलनांमध्ये फरक का पडतो?

Because a per-100 g comparison flatters whatever is eaten in small portions. 1 medium phulka roti of roti (chapati) weighs 45 g and 1 poori of poori weighs 30 g, so the per-gram ranking and the per-plate ranking are answering different questions. The serving row is the one that decides what you ate.

Nutrient values are averages for the stated preparation, based on the Indian Food Composition Tables 2017 (ICMR–NIN) and standard recipe analysis. Energy is reconciled against the macronutrients with Atwater factors on every build. General information only — not medical or nutrition advice. Home-cooked Indian food varies enormously with oil, ghee and portion size; every value here is an average for a stated serving, with the assumption shown.

स्रोत·IFCT 2017 + published recipe weights·पुनरावलोकन जुलै 2026

The people behind these sites

Follow the build

This site and nine others like it are built and photographed by two people: Amit Sharma — behind the build; Geeta Patel — the poses, demonstrated. New work goes up on Instagram and Facebook before it reaches a page here.

Amit Sharma @amitsharmaofficial Instagram

Geeta Patel @geetapatelnz Instagram

Geeta Patel GeetaPatelYoga Facebook

Following changes nothing here — every page stays open, with no account and no wall.