Aloo Gobi vs Lauki Sabzi
दोन्ही बाजू एकाच तक्त्यावरून मोजल्या आहेत, आणि प्रत्येक पदार्थ प्रत्यक्षात ज्या प्रमाणात खाल्ला जातो त्या सर्व्हिंगवर.
The short answer
कोणता जड आहे
Per 100 g, aloo gobi is heavier — 105 kcal against 42 kcal for lauki sabzi, about 150% more. Per real serving the picture changes: 1 katori of aloo gobi is 158 kcal, while 1 katori of lauki sabzi is 63 kcal, because the portions are not the same size. On protein, aloo gobi wins with 2.6 g per 100 g.
स्रोत·ICMR–NIN dietary guidance for Indians + weighed portions·1 katori entered at 150 g·पुनरावलोकन जुलै 2026
शेजारी शेजारी
| Aloo Gobi | Lauki Sabzi | |
|---|---|---|
| गृहीत धरलेले सर्व्हिंग | 1 katori · 150 g | 1 katori · 150 g |
| प्रति सर्व्हिंग कॅलरी | 158 | 63 |
| प्रति 100 g कॅलरी | 105 | 42 |
| प्रति 100 g प्रथिने | 2.6 g | 0.6 g |
| प्रति 100 g कर्बोदके | 11.0 g | 2.0 g |
| प्रति 100 g स्निग्धांश | 5.5 g | 3.5 g |
| प्रति 100 g तंतू | 2.8 g | 2.3 g |
| एक सर्व्हिंग जाळण्यासाठी लागणारे चालणे | 37 मिनिटे | 15 मिनिटे |
स्रोत·IFCT 2017 + published recipe weights·पुनरावलोकन जुलै 2026
दोन पदार्थांची तुलना कशी शक्य केली जाते
- Both columns start from the same source — the per-100 g rows for aloo gobi and lauki sabzi in the Indian Food Composition Tables 2017. वाद जिंकण्यासाठी कोणतीही बाजू वेगळ्या डेटाबेसमधून घेतलेली नाही.
- Each dish keeps its own serving weight: 1 katori at 150 g, 1 katori at 150 g. दोन्हींना एकाच समान 100 g वर बसवणे हेच बहुतेक अन्नतुलना निरुपयोगी करते.
- नंतर दोन्ही ओळी एकाच पद्धतीने प्रमाणात आणल्या जातात आणि शेजारी शेजारी छापल्या जातात, त्यामुळे प्रति-ग्रॅम क्रम आणि प्रति-ताट क्रम उघडपणे वेगळे पडू शकतात — आणि भारतीय पदार्थांच्या बाबतीत ते नेहमीच पडतात.
Aloo Gobi 105 kcal/100 g × 150 g ÷ 100 = 158 kcal Lauki Sabzi 42 kcal/100 g × 150 g ÷ 100 = 63 kcal
हे कसे वाचावे
Per-100 g comparisons flatter whatever is eaten in small portions. Aloo Gobi is denser per gram, but people do not eat by the gram — aloo gobi arrives as 1 katori and lauki sabzi as 1 katori, and that is where the real difference shows up.
Aloo Gobi carries more protein, which matters more than the calorie gap if you are trying to stay full. Both figures assume home cooking with a measured amount of oil; a restaurant plate of either can run 30 to 60% higher.
प्रश्न
Which has more calories, aloo gobi or lauki sabzi?
Per 100 g, aloo gobi is heavier — 105 kcal against 42 kcal for lauki sabzi, about 150% more. Per real serving the picture changes: 1 katori of aloo gobi is 158 kcal, while 1 katori of lauki sabzi is 63 kcal, because the portions are not the same size. On protein, aloo gobi wins with 2.6 g per 100 g.
Which has more protein, aloo gobi or lauki sabzi?
Aloo Gobi — 2.6 g per 100 g against 0.6 g. Per real serving that becomes 3.9 g in 1 katori against 0.9 g in 1 katori.
दोन्ही तुलनांमध्ये फरक का पडतो?
Because a per-100 g comparison flatters whatever is eaten in small portions. 1 katori of aloo gobi weighs 150 g and 1 katori of lauki sabzi weighs 150 g, so the per-gram ranking and the per-plate ranking are answering different questions. The serving row is the one that decides what you ate.
Nutrient values are averages for the stated preparation, based on the Indian Food Composition Tables 2017 (ICMR–NIN) and standard recipe analysis. Energy is reconciled against the macronutrients with Atwater factors on every build. General information only — not medical or nutrition advice. Home-cooked Indian food varies enormously with oil, ghee and portion size; every value here is an average for a stated serving, with the assumption shown.
स्रोत·IFCT 2017 + published recipe weights·पुनरावलोकन जुलै 2026
The people behind these sites
Follow the build
This site and nine others like it are built and photographed by two people: Amit Sharma — behind the build; Geeta Patel — the poses, demonstrated. New work goes up on Instagram and Facebook before it reaches a page here.
Amit Sharma
@amitsharmaofficial
Instagram
Geeta Patel
@geetapatelnz
Instagram
Geeta Patel
GeetaPatelYoga
Facebook
Following changes nothing here — every page stays open, with no account and no wall.
