Besan Chilla vs Moong Dal Chilla

दोन्ही बाजू एकाच तक्त्यावरून मोजल्या आहेत, आणि प्रत्येक पदार्थ प्रत्यक्षात ज्या प्रमाणात खाल्ला जातो त्या सर्व्हिंगवर.

बेसन चिल्ला

211

kcal per 2 chillas (120 g) · 176 kcal/100 g

अधिक ऊर्जा-घन

विरुद्ध

Moong Dal Chilla

192

kcal per 2 chillas (120 g) · 160 kcal/100 g

The short answer

कोणता जड आहे

Per 100 g, besan chilla is heavier — 176 kcal against 160 kcal for moong dal chilla, about 10% more. Per real serving the picture changes: 2 chillas of besan chilla is 211 kcal, while 2 chillas of moong dal chilla is 192 kcal, because the portions are not the same size. On protein, moong dal chilla wins with 8.5 g per 100 g.

स्रोत·ICMR–NIN dietary guidance for Indians + weighed portions·2 chillas entered at 120 g·पुनरावलोकन जुलै 2026

शेजारी शेजारी

	बेसन चिल्ला	Moong Dal Chilla
गृहीत धरलेले सर्व्हिंग	2 chillas · 120 g	2 chillas · 120 g
प्रति सर्व्हिंग कॅलरी	211	192
प्रति 100 g कॅलरी	176	160
प्रति 100 g प्रथिने	8.2 g	8.5 g
प्रति 100 g कर्बोदके	17.9 g	17.0 g
प्रति 100 g स्निग्धांश	7.9 g	6.0 g
प्रति 100 g तंतू	5.9 g	3.2 g
एक सर्व्हिंग जाळण्यासाठी लागणारे चालणे	49 मिनिटे	45 मिनिटे

स्रोत·IFCT 2017 + published recipe weights·पुनरावलोकन जुलै 2026

दोन पदार्थांची तुलना कशी शक्य केली जाते

Both columns start from the same source — the per-100 g rows for besan chilla and moong dal chilla in the Indian Food Composition Tables 2017. वाद जिंकण्यासाठी कोणतीही बाजू वेगळ्या डेटाबेसमधून घेतलेली नाही.
Each dish keeps its own serving weight: 2 chillas at 120 g, 2 chillas at 120 g. दोन्हींना एकाच समान 100 g वर बसवणे हेच बहुतेक अन्नतुलना निरुपयोगी करते.
नंतर दोन्ही ओळी एकाच पद्धतीने प्रमाणात आणल्या जातात आणि शेजारी शेजारी छापल्या जातात, त्यामुळे प्रति-ग्रॅम क्रम आणि प्रति-ताट क्रम उघडपणे वेगळे पडू शकतात — आणि भारतीय पदार्थांच्या बाबतीत ते नेहमीच पडतात.

Besan Chilla       176 kcal/100 g × 120 g ÷ 100 = 211 kcal
Moong Dal Chilla   160 kcal/100 g × 120 g ÷ 100 = 192 kcal

The full method, and where it is weakest →

हे कसे वाचावे

Per-100 g comparisons flatter whatever is eaten in small portions. Besan Chilla is denser per gram, but people do not eat by the gram — besan chilla arrives as 2 chillas and moong dal chilla as 2 chillas, and that is where the real difference shows up.

Moong Dal Chilla carries more protein, which matters more than the calorie gap if you are trying to stay full. Fibre also favours besan chilla here. Both figures assume home cooking with a measured amount of oil; a restaurant plate of either can run 30 to 60% higher.

प्रश्न

Which has more calories, besan chilla or moong dal chilla?

Which has more protein, besan chilla or moong dal chilla?

Moong Dal Chilla — 8.5 g per 100 g against 8.2 g. Per real serving that becomes 10.2 g in 2 chillas against 9.8 g in 2 chillas.

दोन्ही तुलनांमध्ये फरक का पडतो?

Because a per-100 g comparison flatters whatever is eaten in small portions. 2 chillas of besan chilla weighs 120 g and 2 chillas of moong dal chilla weighs 120 g, so the per-gram ranking and the per-plate ranking are answering different questions. The serving row is the one that decides what you ate.

Nutrient values are averages for the stated preparation, based on the Indian Food Composition Tables 2017 (ICMR–NIN) and standard recipe analysis. Energy is reconciled against the macronutrients with Atwater factors on every build. General information only — not medical or nutrition advice. Home-cooked Indian food varies enormously with oil, ghee and portion size; every value here is an average for a stated serving, with the assumption shown.

स्रोत·IFCT 2017 + published recipe weights·पुनरावलोकन जुलै 2026

The people behind these sites

Follow the build

This site and nine others like it are built and photographed by two people: Amit Sharma — behind the build; Geeta Patel — the poses, demonstrated. New work goes up on Instagram and Facebook before it reaches a page here.

Amit Sharma @amitsharmaofficial Instagram

Geeta Patel @geetapatelnz Instagram

Geeta Patel GeetaPatelYoga Facebook

Following changes nothing here — every page stays open, with no account and no wall.