Poha vs उपमा
दोन्ही बाजू एकाच तक्त्यावरून मोजल्या आहेत, आणि प्रत्येक पदार्थ प्रत्यक्षात ज्या प्रमाणात खाल्ला जातो त्या सर्व्हिंगवर.
The short answer
कोणता जड आहे
Per 100 g, poha is heavier — 175 kcal against 112 kcal for upma, about 56% more. Per real serving the picture changes: 1 plate of poha is 280 kcal, while 1 plate of upma is 224 kcal, because the portions are not the same size. On protein, poha wins with 3.0 g per 100 g.
स्रोत·ICMR–NIN dietary guidance for Indians + weighed portions·1 ताट 160 g म्हणून नोंदवले·पुनरावलोकन जुलै 2026
शेजारी शेजारी
| Poha | उपमा | |
|---|---|---|
| गृहीत धरलेले सर्व्हिंग | 1 plate · 160 g | 1 plate · 200 g |
| प्रति सर्व्हिंग कॅलरी | 280 | 224 |
| प्रति 100 g कॅलरी | 175 | 112 |
| प्रति 100 g प्रथिने | 3.0 g | 2.5 g |
| प्रति 100 g कर्बोदके | 25.1 g | 13.6 g |
| प्रति 100 g स्निग्धांश | 6.9 g | 5.3 g |
| प्रति 100 g तंतू | 1.3 g | 2.7 g |
| एक सर्व्हिंग जाळण्यासाठी लागणारे चालणे | 65 मिनिटे | 52 मिनिटे |
स्रोत·IFCT 2017 + published recipe weights·पुनरावलोकन जुलै 2026
दोन पदार्थांची तुलना कशी शक्य केली जाते
- Both columns start from the same source — the per-100 g rows for poha and upma in the Indian Food Composition Tables 2017. वाद जिंकण्यासाठी कोणतीही बाजू वेगळ्या डेटाबेसमधून घेतलेली नाही.
- Each dish keeps its own serving weight: 1 plate at 160 g, 1 plate at 200 g. दोन्हींना एकाच समान 100 g वर बसवणे हेच बहुतेक अन्नतुलना निरुपयोगी करते.
- नंतर दोन्ही ओळी एकाच पद्धतीने प्रमाणात आणल्या जातात आणि शेजारी शेजारी छापल्या जातात, त्यामुळे प्रति-ग्रॅम क्रम आणि प्रति-ताट क्रम उघडपणे वेगळे पडू शकतात — आणि भारतीय पदार्थांच्या बाबतीत ते नेहमीच पडतात.
Poha 175 kcal/100 g × 160 g ÷ 100 = 280 kcal Upma 112 kcal/100 g × 200 g ÷ 100 = 224 kcal
हे कसे वाचावे
Per-100 g comparisons flatter whatever is eaten in small portions. Poha is denser per gram, but people do not eat by the gram — poha arrives as 1 plate and upma as 1 plate, and that is where the real difference shows up.
Poha carries more protein, which matters more than the calorie gap if you are trying to stay full. Both figures assume home cooking with a measured amount of oil; a restaurant plate of either can run 30 to 60% higher.
प्रश्न
Which has more calories, poha or upma?
Per 100 g, poha is heavier — 175 kcal against 112 kcal for upma, about 56% more. Per real serving the picture changes: 1 plate of poha is 280 kcal, while 1 plate of upma is 224 kcal, because the portions are not the same size. On protein, poha wins with 3.0 g per 100 g.
Which has more protein, poha or upma?
Poha — 3.0 g per 100 g against 2.5 g. Per real serving that becomes 4.8 g in 1 plate against 5.0 g in 1 plate.
दोन्ही तुलनांमध्ये फरक का पडतो?
Because a per-100 g comparison flatters whatever is eaten in small portions. 1 plate of poha weighs 160 g and 1 plate of upma weighs 200 g, so the per-gram ranking and the per-plate ranking are answering different questions. The serving row is the one that decides what you ate.
Nutrient values are averages for the stated preparation, based on the Indian Food Composition Tables 2017 (ICMR–NIN) and standard recipe analysis. Energy is reconciled against the macronutrients with Atwater factors on every build. General information only — not medical or nutrition advice. Home-cooked Indian food varies enormously with oil, ghee and portion size; every value here is an average for a stated serving, with the assumption shown.
स्रोत·IFCT 2017 + published recipe weights·पुनरावलोकन जुलै 2026
The people behind these sites
Follow the build
This site and nine others like it are built and photographed by two people: Amit Sharma — behind the build; Geeta Patel — the poses, demonstrated. New work goes up on Instagram and Facebook before it reaches a page here.
Amit Sharma
@amitsharmaofficial
Instagram
Geeta Patel
@geetapatelnz
Instagram
Geeta Patel
GeetaPatelYoga
Facebook
Following changes nothing here — every page stays open, with no account and no wall.
