Sweet Lassi vs Chaas (Buttermilk)
Both sides computed from the same table, at the serving each is actually eaten in.
Per 100 g, sweet lassi is heavier — 100 kcal against 35 kcal for chaas (buttermilk), about 186% more. Per real serving the picture changes: 1 glass of sweet lassi is 250 kcal, while 1 glass of chaas (buttermilk) is 88 kcal, because the portions are not the same size. On protein, sweet lassi wins with 2.6 g per 100 g.
Side by side
| Sweet Lassi | Chaas (Buttermilk) | |
|---|---|---|
| Serving assumed | 1 glass · 250 g | 1 glass · 250 g |
| Calories per serving | 250 | 88 |
| Calories per 100 g | 100 | 35 |
| Protein per 100 g | 2.6 g | 1.8 g |
| Carbs per 100 g | 15.0 g | 3.0 g |
| Fat per 100 g | 3.3 g | 1.5 g |
| Fibre per 100 g | 0.0 g | 0.0 g |
| Walking to burn one serving | 58 min | 20 min |
How to read this
Per-100 g comparisons flatter whatever is eaten in small portions. Sweet Lassi is denser per gram, but people do not eat by the gram — sweet lassi arrives as 1 glass and chaas (buttermilk) as 1 glass, and that is where the real difference shows up.
Sweet Lassi carries more protein, which matters more than the calorie gap if you are trying to stay full. Both figures assume home cooking with a measured amount of oil; a restaurant plate of either can run 30 to 60% higher.
Nutrient values are averages for the stated preparation, based on the Indian Food Composition Tables 2017 (ICMR–NIN) and standard recipe analysis. Energy is reconciled against the macronutrients with Atwater factors on every build. General information only — not medical or nutrition advice. Home-cooked Indian food varies enormously with oil, ghee and portion size; every value here is an average for a stated serving, with the assumption shown.